Anyone who lives in Chicago and takes public transportation knows that the Red Line is full of smells. Just today I walked onto the Red Line only to be taken aback by a strong but familiar one – the smell of relaxer. Or, I guess as white people call it, “chemical straightener.” I had this (or some version of it) put in my hair twice as a pre-teen, and I knew the smell immediately. Even after this young girl walked off the train – with much confidence – it lingered. This is some serious stuff. And it’s one of the focuses of Chris Rock’s funny but illuminating documentary, Good Hair.
Let me start off by clarifying one thing: I know this is about Black women’s hair. I also know I will never personally understand the stress and maintenance that many Black women go through with their hair. While I learned some things I didn’t know before the film, I found that – just by being a woman with hair – I was able to relate to a lot of what this doc portrayed. And for everyone else…I think you’ll definitely be entertained and informed.
Rock was inspired to make the documentary after one of his (adorable) young daughters asked him, “Daddy, how come I don’t have good hair?” The doc explores the topic of what it means to have “good” hair, largely through interviews with a diverse range of Black men and women – everyone from Ice-T to dermatologists to music video stars. (Yeah, apparently Ice-T gets his own category.) Oh, and did I mention Maya Angelou? She provides some brief insight on the topic as well.
There are a multitude of topics explored under the umbrella subject of “good hair.” Rock uses the diverse interviews for perspective, a hair convention performance contest for entertainment, and a trip to India for the back story of many African-American weaves.
Most interesting, perhaps, are the permeating themes that come up frequently at various points of the doc. One being the understanding or orientation that Black men already have to Black women’s hair. One interviewee commented on how Black men get this because they grew up with their mothers and sisters doing the same things every day. Actor Nia Long talked about how other men, such as white men, don’t understand her hair maintenance at all, and might even be scared of it as something unfamiliar to them.
On the other hand, another theme popped up – the notion that, as KRS-One says outright, ALL women strive to have long, straight “European” (a word frequently used in the film) hair. Ice-T says something to the effect of, “Let’s talk to all those famous white girls and see if THEIR long hair is real”…as a cutaway reveals Paris Hilton and her obvious blonde hair “extensions.”
This all comes to the realization that, no matter your ethnicity, hair is very important for most women. Whether it’s using chemical relaxer on what people offensively call “nappy” locks, or dying your hair bleach blonde regardless of your natural features, or refusing to cut your hair because its length has become a protective shield to you – hair has meaning for us females. As a completely bald woman with alopecia poignantly said in the doc:
I think hair is so important because our self-esteem is wrapped up in it.
From a white woman’s point of view, I know I’ve always been told that my hair looks better curly – in its natural state. I think a lot of white women hear that same thing, actually. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem like enough people are telling Black women and girls that their hair is beautiful just the way it is. This is portrayed by the 3-year-olds getting their hair relaxed. Or the scene where one high school girl with a cute short Afro sits awkwardly as relaxed-haired women say they don’t think any woman can be taken seriously as a professional unless her hair is straightened.
One thing that’s brushed over in the film but comes up a lot when people talk about the film is the WHY. Why do Black women want straight hair? Why did people freak out when Solange Knowles cut off her hair? Why doesn’t the rest of the world accept Black hair in its natural state? These questions went largely unanswered, but the assumed answer that Chris Rock and his interviewees seemed to give is simply that Black hair is not understood by non-Black people.
The film offers not only humor, but empathy towards the subject of Black hair. However, I’m struggling to decide what the documentary does more – empathize and explain, or ridicule? I hope that – once more people see the film – the whole point of Chris Rock’s endeavor doesn’t become counterproductive.
What I’m saying is: While this is a movie about Black women’s hair, I think it’s important to remember that we shouldn’t go see this doc and then come out of it saying, “Wow, those women are CRAZY and spend SO much money on all this hair stuff! How ridiculous!” Instead, why don’t we take a step back, get past the laughs, learn a thing or two that we never thought about before, and also recognize that many women – regardless of race – do crap to their hair. Most of us women, let’s face it, abuse our hair for years and years, just to force it to be something that it’s not. And thank you, Chris Rock, for caring enough to take on that issue and portray it in a well-balanced light.
I feel like the “why” might even be an entirely new documentary. But yeah, it definitely should be addressed.
And as a South Asian woman, I know my hair (especially when it is long) is the most sexually charged part of my body. It’s portrayed as the epitome of our mystery and exoticism.
Beyond that, I learned a bit about hair when I was in Africa over the summer – women there obviously treat their hair differently and have different styles for it, and I think there isn’t as much comparison to European hair. But of course, television and other media is becoming more popular there by the minute – so we’ll see how things change.
Yeah, it’s really interesting how the meaning of hair varies across cultures – but still seems to matter in some respect to females worldwide.
I really want to see it, but I’m upset that everything I’ve seen promoting it and heard from people who have seen it have said it seems to avoid the “why” question, which seems to be the most important.
Rock was on The View and NONE of them even wanted to acknowledge the “white standard of beauty” issue.
I think no one, especially Chris, wants to address the “white standard of beauty” issue because it’s a really touchy, really heartbreaking subject. There is this underlying idea in the black community that we have to stick together, we have to love ourselves, and yet we routinely do something that is not “loving” towards ourselves. As women, we are essentially attacking what was given to us naturally and it’s not just about maintenance (as many Black women claim). I think Chris knows not to answer it because as a man, he can’t really account for what Black women do TOTALLY or why they do it. He’d probably face a world of criticism from Black women. I think this film is a good stepping stone, possibly the influence to really dig into the issue of why and perhaps begin address standards of beauty and how they affect women of all races.
I agree – I think it’s definitely a good stepping stone, as long as people don’t focus only on the humor and walk away feeling like, “Oh, that was so ridiculous and funny.” But it’s good that, instead, people seem to be more driven to at least think about the deeper issues after hearing about or seeing this movie.
It focused more on industry than it did the underlying significance of straight hair. Which is confusing coming from a man whose career has been founded in fearlessly exploring the psyche of the black community. And what little historical/social examination it did offer wasn’t enough to really take hold of. (Although, the scene where the girls tell their friend, in a roundabout fashion, that she won’t be taken seriously in the professional world until her hair is straight was brutal.) And I did like Maya Angelou’s assertion that a black woman keeping hair in its natural state is considered radical.
If you’re ever in a bookstore and have some time to kill, there’s a chapter in Steven Levitt’s book Freakanomics titled ‘Would a Roshanda by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet?’ It examines the dissimilarity between white names and black names, then determines any such consequence. (Spoiler: The name doesn’t mean anything. The baby’s life was determined well before it was conceived.) The chapter offers that for a black parent to give their child a “white-sounding” name is tantamount to turning your back on the neighborhood.
And so I thought the concept of hair was the perfect springboard for the examination of urban identity and construct. Instead, it had little more weight than Marc Summers talking about the Otis Spunkmeyer factory.
(I’d like to add that I was able to understand the value and universal importance of hair as it relates to self. But as a man, it’s one of those things that you really have to live through and endure to fully grasp and appreciate. In fact, I’m thinking I’ve only got a few years left with my own. )
First of all, love the Marc Summers comment. Despite how lame it is, I find myself watching Unwrapped in the wee hours of the night all too often…
And you bring up an excellent point that I didn’t give as much thought as I should have – the fact that men can also feel the emotional and societal importance of hair. Even in the documentary, plenty of men contributed to the discussion, and many of them mentioned their own hair maintenance. Thanks for shedding light on that! I didn’t mean to make hair an ONLY-women thing.
And I’ve heard a lot about Freakonomics. I’ll have to give it a read one of these days.